Skip to content

Machiavelli Meets DAOs: a16z's Vision for Decentralized Governance

Even in the digital age, we turn to centuries-old wisdom to navigate modern challenges. However, while Machiavellian principles provide a robust framework, the true test lies in their application.

Table of Contents

Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) are again the talk of the crypto town. This framework promises a future of decentralized governance and decision-making. However, like any early-stage innovation, DAOs face challenges. The primary issue? Designing a governance system that truly decentralizes power, ensuring no single entity or group holds undue influence.

Enter a16z's recent post, which suggests that the answer might lie in the teachings of Niccolò Machiavelli, a 16th-century political philosopher known for his pragmatic approach to power dynamics.

Machiavelli's principles, developed during a time of intense social power struggles, resonate with the challenges faced by today's DAOs. These organizations often grapple with unclear or inefficient social hierarchies. a16z proposes four Machiavellian guidelines for DAOs:

  1. Governance Minimization: Reduce human-subjective decisions to maintain a DAO's neutrality.
  2. Balanced Leadership: Establish a leadership class that's continually subject to opposition, ensuring no single group dominates.
  3. Pathway for Leadership Upheaval: Allow for the regular turnover of leadership roles.
  4. Increased Accountability: Ensure leaders are held responsible for their actions.

The Machiavellian Misfit?

While Machiavelli's insights into power dynamics are undeniably valuable, there's a potential misalignment when applying them wholesale to the crypto space. Machiavellian strategies are often seen as cut-throat and neo-liberal, focusing on the consolidation and exercise of power. This approach might seem at odds with the counter-culture, community-driven ethos that underpins much of the crypto world.

To DAO or Not to DAO: An Existential Question Looms for DeFi Networks
Decentralized autonomous organizations or DAOs are not legally considered persons or entities. So how do you catch a happy ghost?

At face value, competition is good. It drives innovation, keeps entities in check, and prevents monopolistic behaviors. However, in the context of DAOs, too much competition could lead to fragmentation and inefficiencies. DAOs thrive on collaboration and shared goals. If every decision becomes a battleground for competing interests, it could slow down progress.

The crypto space, at its heart, is about democratizing access to financial systems, fostering community-driven projects, and promoting transparency. Machiavellian tactics, which often advocate for manipulation and power plays, could be perceived as antithetical to these ideals.

a16z's proposals offer a fresh perspective on DAO governance, drawing from historical principles. While some of their suggestions could enhance DAO governance, others might be at odds with the core values of the crypto community. As with all things in this rapidly evolving space, a balanced approach, tailored to the unique needs and ethos of each DAO, will likely be the most effective.

And as for Machiavelli? Well, he might have been a crypto whale in today's world, but his principles would need some "decentralized tweaking" to fit seamlessly into the DAO landscape.


  • Sam Bankman-Fried's Appeal Denied; Remains in Custody: The former cryptocurrency billionaire will remain in custody pending his trial, after an appeals court in the US upheld a decision to revoke bail. The trial is scheduled to commence on October 3. He faces seven charges of fraud and conspiracy linked to the collapse of FTX, the cryptocurrency exchange he founded, which is now bankrupt.
  • Binance Seeks Dismissal of SEC Lawsuit: Changpeng Zhao, the CEO of Binance, has formally requested the court to dismiss the lawsuit filed against him by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), saying that the financial regulatory had overstepped its authority in the lawsuit against them. Lawyers for Binance and Zhao say the agency did not introduce clear guidelines for the sector ahead of its lawsuit against the crypto exchange and as a result, had imposed its regulatory authority over the crypto sector retroactively.
  • GGV Capital to Split China Business Amid Regulatory Landscape: US venture firm GGV Capital is planning to separate its China business. This decision comes amidst the evolving regulatory environment and the increasing complexities of operating in the Chinese market. Rival Sequoia in June also said it would be splitting its businesses in China, India and Southeast Asia into two independent firms. According to a Reuters report, GGV said the separation of its Singapore arm, which will solely focus on investing in China, will finish by Q1 2024. GGV, which has around $9 billion AUM, has backed web3 social network CyberConnect, blockchain security firm Secure3, blockchain infrastructure provider InfStones, gamefi and NFT giant Animoca Brands, decentralized cross-rollup bridge Orbiter Finance and more.
  • Core Scientific Doubles Down on Bitcoin Mining Despite Bankruptcy: In a bold move amidst its ongoing bankruptcy proceedings, Core Scientific, a prominent Bitcoin mining company, has committed to purchasing a staggering 27,000 servers from Bitmain, the renowned mining hardware manufacturer. The deal, valued at $77 million, signals Core Scientific's unwavering belief in the profitability and future of Bitcoin mining. While the company navigates its financial challenges, this acquisition suggests a strategic push to bolster its mining capabilities and potentially regain its footing in the competitive crypto mining landscape.