Five-O busted you for crypto misdemeanours? Blockhead suggests you better call Saw.
The Malaysian cybersecurity authorities released the Policy and Procedures in Seizing Cryptocurrency in a tweet last month, with serious implications on a person’s crypto possessions if suspected of a crime.
Blockhead went through the whole document and asked legal experts about it – so our readers don’t have to.
To start off, it must be noted that this Policy is unlike other regulations in the past:
Chen outlines how Binance will explain tokenized stocks, crypto-backed loans and AI agents to users, and why she treats trust as the objective.
What started as a minor enforcement action now reads like a farce: hidden fee schemes, missing disclosures, and a CFTC that wants a do-over –minus the refund.
A hack turns into a courtroom stress test: when “decentralized” systems reveal their control points, long-settled property law – not crypto norms – decides who gets paid, and who gets exposed.
Draft rules for the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act are exposing contradictions at the heart of web3 lobbying, as industry players push back against the very DeFi exemptions and developer protections they once demanded.
THORChain’s history of centralization, security failures and questionable money flows is well documented. But are today’s critics getting the technical and legal arguments right – and are they applying the same standards to other major DeFi projects?
Three months after Kraken's parent closed its acquisition of the Hong Kong stablecoin card issuer, Reap is building out Mexico as a second hub and pitching AI agents as its next growth channel.
The launch gives a stablecoin native placement on up to 82 million US devices, though at launch users can only hold and send USDC, and the announcement does not say how they will get it into the wallet.
The basic agreement names the venture and splits ownership for the first time, leaving the US connectivity startup in control and its two Japanese shareholders as minority partners.
